Summary
Warren Buffet
prefers to invest in income producing assets rather than non-producing assets
such as gold. He claims that just about
the only reason people buy gold is because of fear. But beneath Buffet’s case against gold
might lie a motive to support the US dollar.
By discouraging investment in gold, Buffet supports the US dollar.
Detailed response
I respond
here in detail to Warren Buffet’s views on gold expressed in the “Berkshire Hathaway
Inc. 2011 Annual report”. [1]
Buffet’s statement is correct that gold will never produce an income stream or anything. It just sits there, lifeless, as he puts it. (See footnote #1.) He claims that assets which never produce anything are bought in the buyer’s hope that someone else will pay more for that asset in the future, and gold is such an asset. Those claims are all reasonable.
Buffet’s statement is correct that gold will never produce an income stream or anything. It just sits there, lifeless, as he puts it. (See footnote #1.) He claims that assets which never produce anything are bought in the buyer’s hope that someone else will pay more for that asset in the future, and gold is such an asset. Those claims are all reasonable.
Buffet appears to avoid investing in gold for fear of
investing in a bubble. He argues
that an investment in gold would be based on the expectation of an expanding
pool of buyers who are enticed to buy by a belief that the buying pool will
expand even further.
Buffet’s reference to tulips in the same section implicitly
suggests that investment in gold has parallels with “investments” in the great
Dutch tulip bubble. I believe that analogy
is invalid for two reasons. Firstly, the
supply of tulips was not strictly limited.
The tulip bubble burst when alternative supplies became available,
reducing their scarcity. Gold cannot be
grown, bred, multiplied or printed. The
steady supply of approximately 2400 tons per annum of newly mined gold cannot
easily be increased. Only 160,000 tons
has ever been mined from this planet, in all history. Much is unavailable to the market, stored
eternally in central bank vaults, temples, or in sunken treasure ships.
Secondly, I disagree with the inference that gold is in a
bubble. I define a bubble as existing when
everyday acquaintances and strangers, at dinners or the local pub, enthuse
strongly about buying a particular asset, so spreading demand wildly across the
broader masses of population. Those
circumstances prevailing in Holland which fuelled wide public demand for tulip
bulbs do not exist for gold today.
Therefore, in my opinion, there is currently no gold bubble, and
therefore I believe that if any gold bubble were to burst in the near future,
the fall in the gold price would not be as severe as it was for tulips. Eventually, there may well be a gold bubble
which will burst, but that is not relevant to the current discussion. When drunks in bars enthusiastically tell you
that you should buy gold, then it will be time to sell gold because the bubble’s
burst would be imminent. Therefore I
perceive today less risk associated with gold investment than with tulip
investments at the time, and that Buffet’s analogy with tulips is a little
misleading.
Buffet also suggests that gold demand is driven by a fear
of almost all other assets, especially paper money. There is currently great fear about the
future value of the US dollar and the euro, both of which are being inflated by
massive quantitative easing money printing programs which are devaluing those
currencies. I believe devaluation will
continue over the long term. (See [2].)
Buffet claims that what motivates most gold purchasers is
their belief that the ranks of the fearful will grow. It is difficult to know what motivates most
gold purchasers, but I believe there are many gold purchasers, especially in
Asian, “BRIC” (Brazilian, Russian, Indian
and Chinese), and other central banks, whose motivations are not driven by
fear. Some buy gold to diversify away
from the US dollar to preserve the value of their foreign exchange holdings, some
for economic and financial security, and others to strengthen their domestic
currencies: to provide a loose form of
“gold backing” which the west has abandoned.
It is in China’s strategic interest to offer a strong and trustworthy
yuan as an alternative to the US dollar for international trade. It is possible that most gold purchased is
not purchased, as Buffet suggests, because of a belief that the ranks of the
fearful will grow.
Buffet claims that gold is not a good investment because it
is neither of much use, nor procreative.
I argue that gold has uses as a refuge from debased fiat currencies, as
a shelter against inflation, as a convenient and trustworthy store of wealth,
and as a valuable backing for paper currencies.
Underlying my view is my assumption that quantitative easing will fuel increasing
inflation.
Buffet’s statement that “if you own one ounce of gold for
an eternity, you will still own one ounce at its end” is entirely correct, and indeed that is why
the Chinese accumulate gold. Ownership
of gold is not for ownership’s sake per se, rather it is for reliably storing wealth. Gold can be bartered or sold for paper money
in the future, and Buffet agrees that currency based investments are amongst
the most dangerous. As currencies lose
value, gold will buy more currency. At
the end of eternity, gold will buy more money.
Therefore investments in gold are preferable to currency based
investments.
I believe that Buffet has held his negative views about
gold for at least the period shown on the chart below.
Courtesy
OptionVue Systems
The
gold price, 2008-2012
Buffet’s focus on fear in his report betrays his
apprehension of the relationship which the gold price has with collective fear. In concentrating attention onto fear Buffet invites
the reader to ponder further the relevance of fear. It is possible that Buffet’s negative views
about gold are influenced by a patriotic and financial incentive to protect and
to support the US dollar currency. It is
in US economic interests to maintain global market confidence in the US
dollar. The gold price is sometimes an
indicator of confidence in the US dollar.
A high gold price can indicate loss of confidence in the dollar. The value of the US dollar generally rises and
falls inversely to the price of gold.
When the gold price falls, the dollar rises.
In discouraging investment in gold, Buffet helps depress the
gold price, which supports the US dollar.
Furthermore, if Buffet were known to buy gold, collective market
sentiment could be signalled that Buffet has less than full confidence in the US
dollar, and the US dollar’s decline would accelerate. Buffet cannot afford to support investment in
gold because to do so could be misinterpreted by global market “groupthink” and
possibly erode confidence in the US dollar and in the global financial system,
and possibly even foster fear.
Conclusion
I believe that Buffet’s primary motivation to claim that
gold is a poor investment is to delay and to slow down the loss of confidence
in the US dollar, and so to stabilise the US currency. Buffet argues that it is unwise to invest in
bubbles, and therefore it is unwise to invest in gold. Buffet rests his argument on the premises
that gold is currently in a bubble, and that any rise in the gold price would
primarily be driven by collective fear, creating a temporary bubble. Buffet provides no evidence for those
premises claimed. I have argued that
those premises are insufficient to support his argument that gold is an unwise
investment, and that there might exist other reasons which would increase the
global demand for gold. But I do agree
that the fearful turn to gold.
Footnote
#1. Actually gold can produce an income stream when leased out. Gold is often leased out to be short sold into the market, to suppress the gold price to support and stabilise fiat currencies such as the US dollar. But no investor would knowingly lease out their asset to drive down the price, even though your fund manager and your broker probably do so with your stock investments. So leasing does not refute the essence of Buffet’s claim, which I endorse.
References
Footnote
#1. Actually gold can produce an income stream when leased out. Gold is often leased out to be short sold into the market, to suppress the gold price to support and stabilise fiat currencies such as the US dollar. But no investor would knowingly lease out their asset to drive down the price, even though your fund manager and your broker probably do so with your stock investments. So leasing does not refute the essence of Buffet’s claim, which I endorse.
References
[1] pp17-19 of the “Berkshire Hathaway
Inc. 2011 Annual report”, found at http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/2011ar/2011ar.pdf.
[2] My presentation to Thomson Reuters: “Gold price fundamentals from a currency perspective”, found at http://options21.com/2011/04/gold-price-fundamentals/.
[2] My presentation to Thomson Reuters: “Gold price fundamentals from a currency perspective”, found at http://options21.com/2011/04/gold-price-fundamentals/.
No comments:
Post a Comment